Together, we – government, industry and society – are changing systems through strong commitments and bold actions.
There’s been nothing usual about 2020. And that means going forward nothing should be “business as usual.”
Across industries we have had to rethink how we do business from top to bottom, accelerating our need for further digitalization and forcing us to build more resilient supply chains.
We have made strong commitments to move towards a more equitable and inclusive world, addressing the pervasive issues of inequality and injustice.
Together, we – government, industry and society – are changing systems through strong commitments and bold actions.
So, when research and recommendations for ending plastic waste are put forward, we applaud them. Recently, Pew Charitable Trusts and SYSTEMIQ released a study providing results-oriented recommendations to ensure a near-plastic-free environment.
We’re actively working on or advocating for many of the solutions outlined in the study, including designing for recyclability, scaling up collection, enhancing both mechanical and advanced recycling, increasing waste management infrastructure and reducing sources of ocean plastic waste. It also notes the need for collaboration between the public and private sector; and it emphasizes focusing efforts where plastic leakage is the highest. These are key to our strategy as well.
However, the report does not acknowledge plastic’s contributions to a low-carbon future. If we’re truly focused on a “system change,” we need to look at the full system because ending plastic waste and reducing carbon are inextricably linked.
Placing a limit on plastic production does not take into consideration the total environmental impact of alternatives. Replacing plastic packaging with other materials would nearly double greenhouse gas emissions and would come with serious environmental tradeoffs. Additionally, alternative materials tend to weigh more and make up a larger percentage of waste. For example, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, in 2017, paper, glass, and metal waste in the U.S. was nearly 3x greater than plastic waste, contributing to higher handling costs for municipalities. Scientific criteria, such as required performance and environmental costs, should be considered when deciding whether plastic – or any material – is selected.
One of the most important functions of packaging is to provide food safety and security. Lightweight plastic provides the world with better access to fresh food, safe drinking water and medicine, and dramatically reduces food waste and the associated GHG emissions. According to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization: “If food wastage were a country, it would be the third largest emitting country in the world.”
To build more sustainable systems, we must acknowledge the benefits of plastics – for humanity and a low-carbon future. At the same time, understanding plastic waste is a significant problem, we also need to address the underlying infrastructure and design gaps.
Pew and SYSTEMIQ’s recent research uses “business as usual” as a benchmark for their future modeling. However, recent industry actions, progress and commitments are already demonstrating that we’ve moved beyond the status quo – and we will continue to accelerate these efforts. Today, there are hundreds of ongoing projects to capitalize on the benefits plastics provide. And they all center on stopping the waste, closing the loop, and making carbon reduction a priority.
To achieve these goals, we’re going to have to take some big steps. That work has already begun.
This unusual year has only accelerated our efforts to address the deeply interconnected challenges our planet faces; and we hope that it has inspired more of our partners – across the public and private sector – to collaborate with us on end-to-end change.
Jim Fitterling, Chairman and CEO